Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5001 - 5010 of 7579 for ye.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
further testified, he “said yes,” allowing them to check his laptop because he thought he had nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731238 - 2023-11-20

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
then stated, “Sorry. No, I don’t.” To which their attorney responded, “Yes sir. Then in absence of that, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28296 - 2007-03-06

State v. Frank Curiel
than not. Correct? A: Yes. Q: What if I change that definition from more likely than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12454 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael V. Norton
a “yes” No. 02-2453 8 or “no” answer from him, at which point he stated “I would rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5663 - 2017-09-19

Sarah Alderman v. Topper A1 Beer & Liquor
into the Peterson home, if he could have some of hers. She said “yes,” and Daniel went to the refrigerator
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6557 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jay M. Timm
to counsel in a free and understanding manner.” Timm answered, “Yes.” This record reflects not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4274 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 25
before you made the observation of the red Honda Civic; is that fair to say? [Officer:] Correct, yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929199 - 2025-05-19

State v. Terrance Taylor
the home. She stated that originally she said “yes” to the search, but then she changed her mind and told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14590 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Frank Curiel
probability with more likely than not. Correct? A: Yes. Q: What if I change that definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12454 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Luis A. Trujillo
things that are set forth in that complaint,” he replied, “Yes.” As the postconviction court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2531 - 2017-09-19