Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50001 - 50010 of 98594 for court records search online.
Search results 50001 - 50010 of 98594 for court records search online.
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. K. Richard Wells
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-1750-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17530 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 99-1750-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17530 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth L. Grover v.
OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16983 - 2005-03-31
OF WISCONSIN : IN SUPREME COURT
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16983 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, this court cannot conclude James was not prejudiced by the error. ¶31 We agree with James that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48079 - 2014-09-15
, this court cannot conclude James was not prejudiced by the error. ¶31 We agree with James that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48079 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, this court cannot conclude James was not prejudiced by the error. ¶31 We agree with James that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48077 - 2014-09-15
, this court cannot conclude James was not prejudiced by the error. ¶31 We agree with James that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48077 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
be used if needed.” Her attorney confirmed that answer. ¶9 The trial court stated, on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609512 - 2023-01-11
be used if needed.” Her attorney confirmed that answer. ¶9 The trial court stated, on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609512 - 2023-01-11
State v. Andrew D.W.
, the following discussion occurred: THE COURT: Does anyone know—On the record, does he have a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15598 - 2005-03-31
, the following discussion occurred: THE COURT: Does anyone know—On the record, does he have a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15598 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
2017 OWI Guidelines District 4
Revocation Alcohol Assessment No Probation Forfeiture + Costs = $811.50 Driver Surcharge = Court Costs
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2017.pdf - 2017-03-02
Revocation Alcohol Assessment No Probation Forfeiture + Costs = $811.50 Driver Surcharge = Court Costs
/publications/fees/docs/d4owi2017.pdf - 2017-03-02
State v. Samuel J.G.
on the criteria listed in § 48.18(5), Stats., and the court must set forth in the record specific findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10742 - 2005-03-31
on the criteria listed in § 48.18(5), Stats., and the court must set forth in the record specific findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10742 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Samuel J.G.
in § 48.18(5), STATS., and the court must set forth in the record specific findings with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10742 - 2017-09-20
in § 48.18(5), STATS., and the court must set forth in the record specific findings with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10742 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Marvin L. Hereford
of record. Id. Hereford argues that the trial court misused its discretion because it suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7922 - 2017-09-19
of record. Id. Hereford argues that the trial court misused its discretion because it suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7922 - 2017-09-19