Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50011 - 50020 of 59543 for do.
Search results 50011 - 50020 of 59543 for do.
COURT OF APPEALS
do think in terms of the victim impact issue she does have some standing here today; and I would ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36585 - 2009-05-26
do think in terms of the victim impact issue she does have some standing here today; and I would ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36585 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a reply brief despite our having granted his March 2025 request for an extension to do so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26
to file a reply brief despite our having granted his March 2025 request for an extension to do so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043048 - 2025-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case. We decline to do so. An extension of Jerrell is a matter for the supreme court, not this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
of this case. We decline to do so. An extension of Jerrell is a matter for the supreme court, not this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33500 - 2008-07-23
Charles R. Koehn v.
or travel allowance for that appearance, contrary to the federal procedural rule requiring that he do so
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17058 - 2005-03-31
or travel allowance for that appearance, contrary to the federal procedural rule requiring that he do so
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17058 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rick E. Norem
, and had no authority to do so. This appeal followed. Legal Standards ¶13 Sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3759 - 2005-03-31
, and had no authority to do so. This appeal followed. Legal Standards ¶13 Sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3759 - 2005-03-31
George E. Thornton v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of Potts and Effros would be to substitute our judgment for the commission’s. We cannot do that. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5228 - 2005-03-31
of Potts and Effros would be to substitute our judgment for the commission’s. We cannot do that. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5228 - 2005-03-31
City of Sheboygan v. Michael J. Grohskopf
court’s footnote statement which we recite in the accompanying footnote.[4] We do not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11515 - 2005-03-31
court’s footnote statement which we recite in the accompanying footnote.[4] We do not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11515 - 2005-03-31
State v. Samuel L. Hogan
. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. The trial court’s determination of what the attorney did and did not do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11514 - 2005-03-31
. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. The trial court’s determination of what the attorney did and did not do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11514 - 2005-03-31
John F. Hernandez v. Patrick E. Behrndt
. A clerk’s notations of a proceeding do not qualify as a written decision. In any event, the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3515 - 2005-03-31
. A clerk’s notations of a proceeding do not qualify as a written decision. In any event, the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3515 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
’ in doing so.” Weiss v. United Fire & Cas. Co., 197 Wis. 2d 365, 389, 541 N.W.2d 753, 761 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36019 - 2009-03-30
’ in doing so.” Weiss v. United Fire & Cas. Co., 197 Wis. 2d 365, 389, 541 N.W.2d 753, 761 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36019 - 2009-03-30