Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50071 - 50080 of 59355 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 50071 - 50080 of 59355 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Alexis C.
. appeals from an order adjudicating him a delinquent for the illegal possession of marijuana. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2489 - 2017-09-19
. appeals from an order adjudicating him a delinquent for the illegal possession of marijuana. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2489 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Adams v. Robert Ruffer
against Robert Ruffer for a violation of a county shoreline ordinance. The County claims that it should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13171 - 2017-09-21
against Robert Ruffer for a violation of a county shoreline ordinance. The County claims that it should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13171 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and observed his corn being transferred by vacuum system onto multiple trucks. At trial, Gellert claimed he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243521 - 2019-07-17
and observed his corn being transferred by vacuum system onto multiple trucks. At trial, Gellert claimed he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243521 - 2019-07-17
State v. Kevin L. Sendejo
sentence. Sendejo claims that the corrected judgment is invalid because it was not ordered by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4067 - 2005-03-31
sentence. Sendejo claims that the corrected judgment is invalid because it was not ordered by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4067 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
;” and (3) “[w]hether there is a meritorious defense to the claim[.]” Allstate Ins. Co. v. Brunswick Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651823 - 2023-05-03
;” and (3) “[w]hether there is a meritorious defense to the claim[.]” Allstate Ins. Co. v. Brunswick Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651823 - 2023-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress the statements he had given during the custodial interrogation, claiming that he had unambiguously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91909 - 2010-02-08
to suppress the statements he had given during the custodial interrogation, claiming that he had unambiguously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91909 - 2010-02-08
CA Blank Order
not support defense counsel’s claim that Robelia could not understand what was said at trial, any challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107373 - 2014-01-27
not support defense counsel’s claim that Robelia could not understand what was said at trial, any challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107373 - 2014-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS
had violated the Declaration and By-Laws in three respects. ¶3 First, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34708 - 2008-11-25
had violated the Declaration and By-Laws in three respects. ¶3 First, he claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34708 - 2008-11-25
[PDF]
Wendell Klein v. Town of Trempealeau
land. The Town had enlarged the culvert during road construction, and the Kleins claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14440 - 2017-09-21
land. The Town had enlarged the culvert during road construction, and the Kleins claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14440 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Harris
. 1983). Last, the trial court correctly rejected Harris’ claim that sundry OSHA rules allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14385 - 2014-09-15
. 1983). Last, the trial court correctly rejected Harris’ claim that sundry OSHA rules allowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14385 - 2014-09-15