Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50101 - 50110 of 68326 for did.
Search results 50101 - 50110 of 68326 for did.
State v. Samantha M. Penkoske
for twenty years. The factors Penkoske offered in mitigation were comparatively wanting; they did little
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12230 - 2005-03-31
for twenty years. The factors Penkoske offered in mitigation were comparatively wanting; they did little
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12230 - 2005-03-31
Raymond R. Chavera v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
considering the intermediate steps. He emphasizes that the department did not attempt to search the rest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8172 - 2005-03-31
considering the intermediate steps. He emphasizes that the department did not attempt to search the rest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8172 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
notification. A. Probable Cause ¶6 Wagenaar contends that Deputy Williams did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116153 - 2014-07-02
notification. A. Probable Cause ¶6 Wagenaar contends that Deputy Williams did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116153 - 2014-07-02
State v. Thomas J. O.
of justice if he did not accept the plea. The trial court denied his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14913 - 2013-03-31
of justice if he did not accept the plea. The trial court denied his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14913 - 2013-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John G. Anderson
precluded any adverse character testimony. The pretrial ruling did not necessarily prohibit all testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
precluded any adverse character testimony. The pretrial ruling did not necessarily prohibit all testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on the grounds that Vasquez did not stipulate to the restitution amount. The circuit court held a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719352 - 2023-10-24
on the grounds that Vasquez did not stipulate to the restitution amount. The circuit court held a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=719352 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. In this case, the court considered appropriate factors, did not consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344979 - 2021-03-11
. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. In this case, the court considered appropriate factors, did not consider
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344979 - 2021-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
raising several new issues on appeal that he did not raise before the circuit court. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209413 - 2018-03-02
raising several new issues on appeal that he did not raise before the circuit court. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209413 - 2018-03-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, that the State did not “belabor the point,” and that the average juror would not know why the standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207499 - 2018-01-22
, that the State did not “belabor the point,” and that the average juror would not know why the standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207499 - 2018-01-22
[PDF]
State v. Malcolm M. Mumm
suppressed the film evidence because the seizure of the films did not yield trial evidence without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3415 - 2017-09-19
suppressed the film evidence because the seizure of the films did not yield trial evidence without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3415 - 2017-09-19