Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50111 - 50120 of 57894 for id.
Search results 50111 - 50120 of 57894 for id.
State v. Christopher L. Combs
hearing on a discharge petition. Id. at 437. Although § 980.02(2)(a) does not assign a burden
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20655 - 2005-12-14
hearing on a discharge petition. Id. at 437. Although § 980.02(2)(a) does not assign a burden
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20655 - 2005-12-14
State v. Frederick W. Prager
of heart by the sentencing court is not a new factor supporting resentencing. See id. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17633 - 2005-05-24
of heart by the sentencing court is not a new factor supporting resentencing. See id. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17633 - 2005-05-24
State v. Charles Barnes
of the defendant. Id. There is a presumption that a trial court acted reasonably when sentencing. Id. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9311 - 2005-03-31
of the defendant. Id. There is a presumption that a trial court acted reasonably when sentencing. Id. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9311 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the character and behavior pattern of the convicted defendant before imposing sentence.’” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34788 - 2014-09-15
of the character and behavior pattern of the convicted defendant before imposing sentence.’” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34788 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is applied to the relevant facts of record to reach a reasonable conclusion. Id. Here, for reasons set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236610 - 2019-03-05
is applied to the relevant facts of record to reach a reasonable conclusion. Id. Here, for reasons set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236610 - 2019-03-05
[PDF]
WR Joint Venture v. Record Town, Inc.
or by a contract between the parties. Id. We will not construe a contract to obligate payment of attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11966 - 2014-09-15
or by a contract between the parties. Id. We will not construe a contract to obligate payment of attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11966 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Marlene Brown v. David G. Dibbell, M.D.
the opportunity to knowledgeably evaluate the available options and attendant risks. Id. The informed consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12800 - 2017-09-21
the opportunity to knowledgeably evaluate the available options and attendant risks. Id. The informed consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case of confusion, discrepancies, and contradictions in testimony of a witness.” Id. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71801 - 2014-09-15
case of confusion, discrepancies, and contradictions in testimony of a witness.” Id. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71801 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Town of LaGrange v. Walworth County Board of Adjustment
). Our review of a summary judgment ruling is de novo. Id. In addition, this case presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7132 - 2017-09-20
). Our review of a summary judgment ruling is de novo. Id. In addition, this case presents a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7132 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484218 - 2022-02-15
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484218 - 2022-02-15