Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50151 - 50160 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50151 - 50160 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
Donald J. Kurylo v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
2000 WI App 102 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15551 - 2009-09-08
2000 WI App 102 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15551 - 2009-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
.” ¶6 Officer David Boldus interviewed Peters several times. Boldus told the jury that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35108 - 2009-01-06
.” ¶6 Officer David Boldus interviewed Peters several times. Boldus told the jury that the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35108 - 2009-01-06
State v. Karl M. Gebhard
v. Richards, 123 Wis.2d 1, 365 N.W.2d 7 (1985). For cases which fall in the “twilight zone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31
v. Richards, 123 Wis.2d 1, 365 N.W.2d 7 (1985). For cases which fall in the “twilight zone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31
State v. Geraldine A. Molzner
Case No. 99-0311-CR State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15091 - 2005-03-31
Case No. 99-0311-CR State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15091 - 2005-03-31
State v. Peter Jay Bartram
v. Goodwin, 457 U.S. 368, 372 (1982). In Bartram’s case, the trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
v. Goodwin, 457 U.S. 368, 372 (1982). In Bartram’s case, the trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
conference in this case. The court set a briefing and hearing schedule as to Omegbu’s motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61611 - 2011-03-23
conference in this case. The court set a briefing and hearing schedule as to Omegbu’s motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61611 - 2011-03-23
Michael Wendt v. John H. Blazek
2001 WI App 91 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3007 - 2015-03-11
2001 WI App 91 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3007 - 2015-03-11
State v. Edward E.Tolliver
, ordered published Aug. 26, 1997), this court evaluated a similar case and addressed somewhat the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12347 - 2009-04-30
, ordered published Aug. 26, 1997), this court evaluated a similar case and addressed somewhat the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12347 - 2009-04-30
State v. Virtis A.
the termination order. We affirm. ¶2 This case is governed by our standard of review. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6666 - 2005-03-31
the termination order. We affirm. ¶2 This case is governed by our standard of review. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the event that Melstrom’s case went to trial. Those amounts are not at issue. No. 2023AP1176-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078106 - 2026-02-17
in the event that Melstrom’s case went to trial. Those amounts are not at issue. No. 2023AP1176-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078106 - 2026-02-17