Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50161 - 50170 of 83988 for simple case search.

Kohl's Foods Store v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that LIRC erred in reversing the administrative law judge’s decision to dismiss the case because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10883 - 2005-03-31

State v. William J. Ludwig
any reason in this case, because none of those factors that I mentioned; mentally or physically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15313 - 2005-05-02

James N. Elliott v. Michael L. Morgan
not discuss the other issues in the case, which can only be addressed once all those whose interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8784 - 2005-03-31

Racine Education Association v. Racine Unified School District
. ¶8 In this case, the parties do not dispute the underlying facts, but rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15574 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
“A decision on a legal issue by an appellate court establishes the law of the case that must be followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52521 - 2010-07-26

Fred Brown v. Friends of Mazo Beach
for [Brown]’s action. I am unaware of any case law that supports his position. He has provided none. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15156 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
court denied his suppression motion, noting “this wasn’t a case of Lonergan simply weaving a couple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50231 - 2010-05-24

[PDF] State of the Judiciary Address 2009
cases I have seen more than my share of lost and forgotten souls. I can say without a doubt that anyone
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress09.pdf - 2009-11-09

Libbie Pesek v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
. It determined that the case turned upon whether Pesek had gross foot deformity, because orthopedic shoes shall
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13457 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that Artisan has not made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Thus, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596933 - 2022-12-06