Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5021 - 5030 of 7646 for yes.
Search results 5021 - 5030 of 7646 for yes.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Sallis’s counsel responded: Yes, I agree. He is on medication, he’s been clear and lucid when I’ve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44871 - 2014-09-15
. Sallis’s counsel responded: Yes, I agree. He is on medication, he’s been clear and lucid when I’ve
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44871 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Terrance Taylor
home, Officer Simonis asked if they could search the home. She stated that originally she said “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14590 - 2017-09-21
home, Officer Simonis asked if they could search the home. She stated that originally she said “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14590 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for children in letters; yes or no?” because he did not understand the meaning of the word “vulgarities
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144669 - 2017-09-21
for children in letters; yes or no?” because he did not understand the meaning of the word “vulgarities
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144669 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. And those were his exact words? [Pettit]: Yes. [Prosecutor]: How do you know that? [Pettit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79456 - 2014-09-15
. And those were his exact words? [Pettit]: Yes. [Prosecutor]: How do you know that? [Pettit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79456 - 2014-09-15
State v. David E. Sanders
]: Yes. ¶5 Ample evidence exists in support of Tunks’s concession. Tunks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5770 - 2005-03-31
]: Yes. ¶5 Ample evidence exists in support of Tunks’s concession. Tunks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5770 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the charges and Smith had answered yes. The court found that Smith’s discussion with trial counsel centered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178258 - 2017-09-21
to the charges and Smith had answered yes. The court found that Smith’s discussion with trial counsel centered
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178258 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
further testified, he “said yes,” allowing them to check his laptop because he thought he had nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731238 - 2023-11-20
further testified, he “said yes,” allowing them to check his laptop because he thought he had nothing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731238 - 2023-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
responded, “I believe so, yes.” ¶8 On redirect examination, counsel testified that he was satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581670 - 2022-10-26
responded, “I believe so, yes.” ¶8 On redirect examination, counsel testified that he was satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581670 - 2022-10-26
[PDF]
State v. Michael V. Norton
a “yes” No. 02-2453 8 or “no” answer from him, at which point he stated “I would rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5663 - 2017-09-19
a “yes” No. 02-2453 8 or “no” answer from him, at which point he stated “I would rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5663 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the decision for you. MR. BYRNES: Okay. DETECTIVE: Do you understand? MR. BYRNES: Yes. DETECTIVE: Do you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83872 - 2012-06-20
the decision for you. MR. BYRNES: Okay. DETECTIVE: Do you understand? MR. BYRNES: Yes. DETECTIVE: Do you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83872 - 2012-06-20