Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50221 - 50230 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50221 - 50230 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2024AP2036 2 conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1093174 - 2026-03-25
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2024AP2036 2 conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1093174 - 2026-03-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572071 - 2022-10-05
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572071 - 2022-10-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064654 - 2026-01-23
).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064654 - 2026-01-23
[PDF]
State v. Outagamie County Board of Adjustment
the case for further proceedings in light of its decisions in State ex rel. Ziervogel v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6306 - 2017-09-19
the case for further proceedings in light of its decisions in State ex rel. Ziervogel v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6306 - 2017-09-19
James D. Luedtke v. Roger A. Luedtke
by jury; verdict in civil cases. SECTION 5. [As amended Nov. 1922] The right of trial by jury shall remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11336 - 2005-03-31
by jury; verdict in civil cases. SECTION 5. [As amended Nov. 1922] The right of trial by jury shall remain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gregory Wolf v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
law judge (ALJ) who heard testimony in this case initially issued findings of fact and an order which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8985 - 2017-09-19
law judge (ALJ) who heard testimony in this case initially issued findings of fact and an order which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8985 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064654 - 2026-01-23
).1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064654 - 2026-01-23
William L. Genrich v. City of Rice Lake
., and Peterson, J. ΒΆ1 PER CURIAM. This case returns to us after we reversed and remanded a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25307 - 2006-05-30
., and Peterson, J. ΒΆ1 PER CURIAM. This case returns to us after we reversed and remanded a summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25307 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion to reconsider, which had not yet been acted on at the time a new judge was assigned to the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06
a motion to reconsider, which had not yet been acted on at the time a new judge was assigned to the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion to reconsider, which had not yet been acted on at the time a new judge was assigned to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06
a motion to reconsider, which had not yet been acted on at the time a new judge was assigned to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699426 - 2023-09-06