Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50221 - 50230 of 68502 for did.
Search results 50221 - 50230 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and concludes his brief with a request for alternative relief of resentencing. Whiteside did not file a timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79043 - 2014-09-15
and concludes his brief with a request for alternative relief of resentencing. Whiteside did not file a timely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79043 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
’ property did not constitute a private nuisance, we do not reach the Smarts’ other appellate issues relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36102 - 2009-04-07
’ property did not constitute a private nuisance, we do not reach the Smarts’ other appellate issues relating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36102 - 2009-04-07
[PDF]
Edwin C. West v. Byran Bartow
. STAT. § 801.50(4)(a). However, West’s habeas petition did not seek relief from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3821 - 2017-09-20
. STAT. § 801.50(4)(a). However, West’s habeas petition did not seek relief from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3821 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the presentence investigation report regarding four Milwaukee county offenses he claimed he did not commit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117319 - 2017-09-21
in the presentence investigation report regarding four Milwaukee county offenses he claimed he did not commit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117319 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and the claims against him must be dismissed because the trial court did not have jurisdiction over his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64697 - 2011-05-23
and the claims against him must be dismissed because the trial court did not have jurisdiction over his person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64697 - 2011-05-23
Taylor County Human Services Department v. Jennifer K.
the conclusion that Jennifer did not comply with the conditions for obtaining the return of her children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20060 - 2005-10-24
the conclusion that Jennifer did not comply with the conditions for obtaining the return of her children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20060 - 2005-10-24
State v. Dawn L. Bogumill
. Stat. §§ 343.44(1) and 343.44(2g)(c).[2] Bogumill argues, as she did in the trial court, that § 343.44
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4624 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. §§ 343.44(1) and 343.44(2g)(c).[2] Bogumill argues, as she did in the trial court, that § 343.44
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4624 - 2005-03-31
State v. William F. Williams
hearing. We disagree and conclude as did the trial court that Williams’s present claim for relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4626 - 2005-03-31
hearing. We disagree and conclude as did the trial court that Williams’s present claim for relief from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4626 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision in his direct appeal. Leventhal did not appeal that court order. In September 2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901417 - 2025-01-15
decision in his direct appeal. Leventhal did not appeal that court order. In September 2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901417 - 2025-01-15
COURT OF APPEALS
destroyed the property, but then admits that he did not file his notice of claim until after filing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58796 - 2011-01-10
destroyed the property, but then admits that he did not file his notice of claim until after filing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58796 - 2011-01-10