Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50241 - 50250 of 82649 for case codes/1000.

[PDF] Jessie Davis v. Kelch Corporation
874 (Ct. App. 1996). Because we conclude that the agency’s findings of fact in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6450 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
outlined in Bangert, WIS. STAT. § 971.08, and additional case law. See State v. Brown, 2006 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204682 - 2017-12-06

[PDF] CA Blank Order
) was 0.068, which was above the .02 limit she was allowed due to her prior convictions. The case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664980 - 2023-06-06

COURT OF APPEALS
. The plaintiff’s insurer in both cases also had a contractual right to reimbursement from its insured in the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74092 - 2011-11-21

[PDF] County of Jefferson v. Glenn C. Kimpel
and, alternatively, 1 This case is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16068 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David A. Krier
consent. Judge Houck then retired, and Judge Leineweber became the presiding Judge in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14912 - 2017-09-21

State v. Guy Douglas
to a secured facility for treatment. Douglas claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11981 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a jury trial, but during voir dire he decided to resolve the case with a plea bargain. He entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06

[PDF] NOTICE
in three separate cases of a total of five counts of armed robbery with the threat of force for robbing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36738 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Timothy J. Novak
(1996). This means that the trial court is obligated, when the necessities of the case so require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3095 - 2017-09-20