Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50241 - 50250 of 82995 for simple case search.
Search results 50241 - 50250 of 82995 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Pearce, 395 U.S. at 725. Later Supreme Court cases have interpreted Pearce as applying “a presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33344 - 2008-07-15
. Pearce, 395 U.S. at 725. Later Supreme Court cases have interpreted Pearce as applying “a presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33344 - 2008-07-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude the case is No. 2019AP781-CR 2 appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259310 - 2020-05-06
conclude the case is No. 2019AP781-CR 2 appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259310 - 2020-05-06
[PDF]
Debra M. Wikel v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
2001 WI App 214 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3322 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 214 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3322 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Leon J. Seese
; reversed in part and cause remanded. NETTESHEIM, J. This case involves an appeal and a cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13079 - 2017-09-21
; reversed in part and cause remanded. NETTESHEIM, J. This case involves an appeal and a cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13079 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tyrone Davis Smith
-0401-CR -3- Sherman Lee Lewis, the victim in this case, testified at the trial that Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10365 - 2017-09-20
-0401-CR -3- Sherman Lee Lewis, the victim in this case, testified at the trial that Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10365 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
suppression issue when she pled no contest. In a June 29, 2005 order in this case, this court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20173 - 2014-09-15
suppression issue when she pled no contest. In a June 29, 2005 order in this case, this court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20173 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by Fischer’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210778 - 2018-04-11
. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by Fischer’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210778 - 2018-04-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and still decid[e] this case[,]” to which Juror 523 answered, “Yes or no? Is that a yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840401 - 2024-08-21
and still decid[e] this case[,]” to which Juror 523 answered, “Yes or no? Is that a yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840401 - 2024-08-21
[PDF]
Lou Emma Hale v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
that a pollution exclusion policy like the one in this case No. 01-1270 5 prevented a property owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3950 - 2017-09-20
that a pollution exclusion policy like the one in this case No. 01-1270 5 prevented a property owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3950 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, concluding that Williams failed to make a prima facie case that the plea colloquy was defective. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920929 - 2025-02-27
, concluding that Williams failed to make a prima facie case that the plea colloquy was defective. Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=920929 - 2025-02-27