Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50261 - 50270 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50261 - 50270 of 83494 for case codes/1000.
State v. Jeffrey L. Thompson
not intend to submit a brief in this case. I do not quite understand why a concession of error is necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5910 - 2005-03-31
not intend to submit a brief in this case. I do not quite understand why a concession of error is necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5910 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674790 - 2023-07-06
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674790 - 2023-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. This case arises from a breach of warranty action commenced over allegedly defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108062 - 2014-02-18
PER CURIAM. This case arises from a breach of warranty action commenced over allegedly defective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108062 - 2014-02-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 2 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121452 - 2014-09-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 2 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121452 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
court accepted the plea and stated: “I guess we don’t have a DNA order since it is a 1999 case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28565 - 2007-03-26
court accepted the plea and stated: “I guess we don’t have a DNA order since it is a 1999 case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28565 - 2007-03-26
David G. Aul v. Charles L. Murray
. Murray waived any objection to having Judge Race preside over the case. See id. at 519, 527 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8833 - 2005-03-31
. Murray waived any objection to having Judge Race preside over the case. See id. at 519, 527 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8833 - 2005-03-31
John D. Hennick v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
.2d 595, 599, 431 N.W.2d 730, 732 (Ct. App. 1988). The facts of this case are undisputed, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9956 - 2005-03-31
.2d 595, 599, 431 N.W.2d 730, 732 (Ct. App. 1988). The facts of this case are undisputed, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9956 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and it was not confusing. Allen told the circuit court he “had a sufficient opportunity to thoroughly discuss the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65782 - 2011-06-13
and it was not confusing. Allen told the circuit court he “had a sufficient opportunity to thoroughly discuss the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65782 - 2011-06-13
[PDF]
State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
sentences commuted pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.13 (“In any case where the court imposes a maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25613 - 2017-09-21
sentences commuted pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 973.13 (“In any case where the court imposes a maximum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25613 - 2017-09-21
Gladys Jean Jones v. Eddie Jones
] to the relevant facts in the case.’’’ Weberg v. Weberg, 158 Wis.2d 540, 546, 463 N.W.2d 382, 384 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13611 - 2005-03-31
] to the relevant facts in the case.’’’ Weberg v. Weberg, 158 Wis.2d 540, 546, 463 N.W.2d 382, 384 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13611 - 2005-03-31