Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50261 - 50270 of 68502 for did.
Search results 50261 - 50270 of 68502 for did.
State v. Arthur W. Sanger, Jr.
that it did and that he was the driver. Sanger indicated that he was on his way home when he took a corner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5330 - 2005-03-31
that it did and that he was the driver. Sanger indicated that he was on his way home when he took a corner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5330 - 2005-03-31
Dino L. Mcquay v. Gary R. Mccaughtry
version. Procedural Violations McQuay argues that he did not receive sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7984 - 2013-03-31
version. Procedural Violations McQuay argues that he did not receive sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7984 - 2013-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
notification. A. Probable Cause ¶6 Wagenaar contends that Deputy Williams did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116153 - 2014-07-02
notification. A. Probable Cause ¶6 Wagenaar contends that Deputy Williams did not have probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116153 - 2014-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that the roads had been plowed, that they did not appear slippery, that he began to change lanes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138013 - 2013-09-24
testified that the roads had been plowed, that they did not appear slippery, that he began to change lanes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138013 - 2013-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
delay by entering a no-contest plea. While the no-contest plea did not affect Nienke’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26788 - 2006-10-16
delay by entering a no-contest plea. While the no-contest plea did not affect Nienke’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26788 - 2006-10-16
CA Blank Order
and the potential penalties. Smart advised the court that he did not wish any further explanation from the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98828 - 2008-11-30
and the potential penalties. Smart advised the court that he did not wish any further explanation from the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98828 - 2008-11-30
State v. Allan Biesterveld
that was dismissed outright and (2) he did not have an opportunity to rebut information presented at sentencing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26272 - 2006-08-22
that was dismissed outright and (2) he did not have an opportunity to rebut information presented at sentencing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26272 - 2006-08-22
COURT OF APPEALS
“turned right into her” at the intersection. ¶4 When he saw her walking, the officer did not see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119854 - 2014-08-26
“turned right into her” at the intersection. ¶4 When he saw her walking, the officer did not see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119854 - 2014-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel. Neither Whiteside’s motion nor his appellant’s brief suggest any sufficient reason why he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79043 - 2012-03-05
counsel. Neither Whiteside’s motion nor his appellant’s brief suggest any sufficient reason why he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79043 - 2012-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to dismiss, concluding Roehl’s complaint did not state a claim for legal malpractice. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58419 - 2011-01-03
motion to dismiss, concluding Roehl’s complaint did not state a claim for legal malpractice. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58419 - 2011-01-03