Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50261 - 50270 of 60173 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 50261 - 50270 of 60173 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims he was “arrested” on the probation hold and thus was constitutionally entitled to, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107360 - 2017-09-21
claims he was “arrested” on the probation hold and thus was constitutionally entitled to, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107360 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
that he understood the information explained on that form, and is not now claiming otherwise. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142819 - 2015-06-02
that he understood the information explained on that form, and is not now claiming otherwise. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142819 - 2015-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was not negligent in discovering the evidence, since he had not previously met Hrbacek; (3) Hrbacek’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165707 - 2017-09-21
was not negligent in discovering the evidence, since he had not previously met Hrbacek; (3) Hrbacek’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165707 - 2017-09-21
July Table of unpublished opinions
court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42 - 2004-08-10
court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42 - 2004-08-10
State v. Calvin C. Grays
and claimed inability to read, noting that Grays’ eyes, head and facial expressions “gave every indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20313 - 2007-06-04
and claimed inability to read, noting that Grays’ eyes, head and facial expressions “gave every indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20313 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This is a vague and weak claim of harm. Miller does not clearly articulate how the expert testimony would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171402 - 2017-09-21
This is a vague and weak claim of harm. Miller does not clearly articulate how the expert testimony would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171402 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
August 2006 Table of Unpublished Opinions
except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26483 - 2017-09-21
except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case. Docket
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for failing to pursue meritless claim). By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213521 - 2018-05-30
for failing to pursue meritless claim). By the Court.—Judgment and order affirmed. This opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213521 - 2018-05-30
State v. Richard M. Brown
materials and claimed that the search warrant application did not establish probable cause to obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10801 - 2005-03-31
materials and claimed that the search warrant application did not establish probable cause to obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10801 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas M. Slawatyniec
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Slawatyniec claims the arresting officer lacked probable cause to administer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2869 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 346.63(1)(b). Slawatyniec claims the arresting officer lacked probable cause to administer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2869 - 2005-03-31