Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50261 - 50270 of 55951 for so.
Search results 50261 - 50270 of 55951 for so.
COURT OF APPEALS
intention to jail someone for contempt without the statutory authority to so act, as not malicious; (5) [w
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77326 - 2012-01-30
intention to jail someone for contempt without the statutory authority to so act, as not malicious; (5) [w
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77326 - 2012-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
a Class C highway.[1] In 2001, the Muellers sought a variance from the thirty-foot setback requirement so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63364 - 2011-05-02
a Class C highway.[1] In 2001, the Muellers sought a variance from the thirty-foot setback requirement so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63364 - 2011-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
twenty days and failure to do so would result in a default judgment. The court determined Douglas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92246 - 2013-01-28
twenty days and failure to do so would result in a default judgment. The court determined Douglas’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92246 - 2013-01-28
Marvin Poirier v. Town of Howard
that can be overcome by credible evidence, and that if it is so overcome, then the burden moves to the town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2105 - 2005-03-31
that can be overcome by credible evidence, and that if it is so overcome, then the burden moves to the town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2105 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Lentowski
disposition of the remedy issue does not require us to address the following, we do so in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11403 - 2005-03-31
disposition of the remedy issue does not require us to address the following, we do so in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11403 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Frankie Groenke
question, the Court’s going to allow you to do so. No. 96-3324-CR 4 Krenzke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11724 - 2017-09-20
question, the Court’s going to allow you to do so. No. 96-3324-CR 4 Krenzke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11724 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
under the umbrella—apparently an impossibility—then it would have had to do so at the coverage trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42361 - 2009-10-19
under the umbrella—apparently an impossibility—then it would have had to do so at the coverage trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42361 - 2009-10-19
State v. James E. Szulczewski
: Mark A. Frankel so indicate) JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10802 - 2005-03-31
: Mark A. Frankel so indicate) JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10802 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dillard Earl Kelley, Sr.
filed by Kelley are so inadequate that an evidentiary hearing was not required. Counsel’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19223 - 2017-09-21
filed by Kelley are so inadequate that an evidentiary hearing was not required. Counsel’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19223 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
detailed testimony from Saffold, so it concluded that Hopgood had failed to demonstrate how this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251710 - 2019-12-19
detailed testimony from Saffold, so it concluded that Hopgood had failed to demonstrate how this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251710 - 2019-12-19