Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5031 - 5040 of 12890 for prosecuting.
Search results 5031 - 5040 of 12890 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
State v. Lamont Williams
to Williams’s case. A case is final for retroactivity purposes if the prosecution is no longer pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7630 - 2017-09-19
to Williams’s case. A case is final for retroactivity purposes if the prosecution is no longer pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7630 - 2017-09-19
State v. Shannon C. Krause
Ragner and Shannon Krause, arguing that the trial court improperly “created” deferred prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15861 - 2005-03-31
Ragner and Shannon Krause, arguing that the trial court improperly “created” deferred prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15861 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig L. Miller
STAT. § 939.66(2m) provides: “Upon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3346 - 2017-09-19
STAT. § 939.66(2m) provides: “Upon prosecution for a crime, the actor may be convicted of either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3346 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Roger A. McGinnis
-3- address. The prosecution objected to this line of questioning and the trial court excluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9887 - 2017-09-19
-3- address. The prosecution objected to this line of questioning and the trial court excluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9887 - 2017-09-19
Meriter Hospital, Inc. v. William Goodman
from serious harm. That defense is unavailable in a prosecution for criminal trespass into an abortion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5898 - 2005-03-31
from serious harm. That defense is unavailable in a prosecution for criminal trespass into an abortion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5898 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is acting in another. The prosecuting authority is in one entity—the State. The respective district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36571 - 2014-09-15
is acting in another. The prosecuting authority is in one entity—the State. The respective district
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36571 - 2014-09-15
State v. Samuel D. Clay
at the preliminary examination to be charged in the information in a multi-count prosecution. The supreme court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
at the preliminary examination to be charged in the information in a multi-count prosecution. The supreme court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9431 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the prosecution of this appeal.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880289 - 2024-11-26
for the prosecution of this appeal.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880289 - 2024-11-26
[PDF]
State v. John W. Moore
be caused to the court, the prosecution and the witnesses by delaying the trial just as it was about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11951 - 2017-09-21
be caused to the court, the prosecution and the witnesses by delaying the trial just as it was about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11951 - 2017-09-21
County of Dane v. James V. Buchanan
the proposition that the weight of the prosecution's evidence is in any way affected by the prosecutor's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8023 - 2005-03-31
the proposition that the weight of the prosecution's evidence is in any way affected by the prosecutor's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8023 - 2005-03-31