Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5031 - 5040 of 72987 for we.
Search results 5031 - 5040 of 72987 for we.
State v. Gary L. Klotz
, and whether the trial court had jurisdiction over his case. Because we conclude that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5188 - 2005-03-31
, and whether the trial court had jurisdiction over his case. Because we conclude that the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5188 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Klotz
. Because we conclude that the trial court had jurisdiction and properly exercised its discretion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5188 - 2017-09-19
. Because we conclude that the trial court had jurisdiction and properly exercised its discretion, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5188 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jackson D. Carpenter
-commitment motion. He raises several issues. We affirm all issues except the Thiel II issue, on which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16060 - 2017-09-21
-commitment motion. He raises several issues. We affirm all issues except the Thiel II issue, on which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16060 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronald Schmidtendorff
. We hold that the stopping officer's need to respond to another call was adequate justification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11098 - 2005-03-31
. We hold that the stopping officer's need to respond to another call was adequate justification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11098 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Avery T., Jr.
- corrections. We reverse the juvenile court because we conclude that Avery did not breach the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8593 - 2017-09-19
- corrections. We reverse the juvenile court because we conclude that Avery did not breach the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8593 - 2017-09-19
State v. Roy D. Townsend
of which resulted in the instant convictions, was unreasonable. We disagree and affirm the convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10825 - 2005-03-31
of which resulted in the instant convictions, was unreasonable. We disagree and affirm the convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10825 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Maxim Kleinsmith v. Menard, Inc.
, it demonstrated “good cause” for setting aside the default judgment. We reject Menard’s contentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2154 - 2017-09-19
, it demonstrated “good cause” for setting aside the default judgment. We reject Menard’s contentions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2154 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Craig D. Hanson v. Kathryn M. Hanson
should pay the additional costs. Because we conclude that under the facts of this case the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12306 - 2017-09-21
should pay the additional costs. Because we conclude that under the facts of this case the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12306 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Schmidtendorff
alcohol concentration. We hold that the stopping officer's need to respond to another call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11098 - 2017-09-19
alcohol concentration. We hold that the stopping officer's need to respond to another call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11098 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 29, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
than was argued at trial. We conclude that he is not. We affirm. ¶2 After a jury trial, Greene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28609 - 2007-03-28
than was argued at trial. We conclude that he is not. We affirm. ¶2 After a jury trial, Greene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28609 - 2007-03-28