Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50311 - 50320 of 62916 for child support.
Search results 50311 - 50320 of 62916 for child support.
State v. Theodore E. Jerome
to demonstrate facts supporting cause to grant the requested relief. Further, the court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12427 - 2005-03-31
to demonstrate facts supporting cause to grant the requested relief. Further, the court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12427 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 (1996), the record does not support Cobbs’s claim. The officers denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31510 - 2008-01-14
States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 (1996), the record does not support Cobbs’s claim. The officers denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31510 - 2008-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
circuit court bias,[4] and accuses the court of “trickery and deception,” but fails to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95618 - 2013-04-22
circuit court bias,[4] and accuses the court of “trickery and deception,” but fails to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95618 - 2013-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
omitted). In support of its summary judgment motion, the defendants-respondents submitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179221 - 2017-09-21
omitted). In support of its summary judgment motion, the defendants-respondents submitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179221 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments based on factual assertions that are insufficiently supported by record references. See, e.g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87675 - 2014-09-15
arguments based on factual assertions that are insufficiently supported by record references. See, e.g
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87675 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert P. Dolan
is refused, is not “coercion” that invalidates consent under the Fourth Amendment). ¶5 In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5247 - 2017-09-19
is refused, is not “coercion” that invalidates consent under the Fourth Amendment). ¶5 In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5247 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not support the determination that counsel was prevented from raising any issues related to its claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93769 - 2014-09-15
not support the determination that counsel was prevented from raising any issues related to its claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93769 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Julie Casper v. Bayfield County Board of Adjustment
, and according to its will, not its judgment; and (4) reached a decision reasonably supported by the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5199 - 2017-09-19
, and according to its will, not its judgment; and (4) reached a decision reasonably supported by the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5199 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
restitution. The transcript of the trial court’s sentencing remarks does not support his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33771 - 2008-08-18
restitution. The transcript of the trial court’s sentencing remarks does not support his contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33771 - 2008-08-18
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth J. Erdmann
between 2:15 and 2:20 a.m. is supported by the timing of the 911 call, and is not clearly erroneous. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13138 - 2017-09-21
between 2:15 and 2:20 a.m. is supported by the timing of the 911 call, and is not clearly erroneous. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13138 - 2017-09-21