Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50311 - 50320 of 56115 for so.
Search results 50311 - 50320 of 56115 for so.
State v. Michael Erickson
was not a search incident to a lawful arrest. In so holding, the court explained: By applying a bright-line rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11260 - 2005-03-31
was not a search incident to a lawful arrest. In so holding, the court explained: By applying a bright-line rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11260 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
actions would cause his own family to be in danger.” Tillmon contends that the interrogation “was so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660675 - 2023-05-31
actions would cause his own family to be in danger.” Tillmon contends that the interrogation “was so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660675 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald Harris
of insufficient evidence “unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the State and the conviction, is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12855 - 2017-09-21
of insufficient evidence “unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the State and the conviction, is so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12855 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
.” Shackelford got cold waiting for the landlord so instead they decided “to shoot up the house.” Although he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41416 - 2014-09-15
.” Shackelford got cold waiting for the landlord so instead they decided “to shoot up the house.” Although he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41416 - 2014-09-15
State v. Chad J. Knoll
of a crime considered at sentencing … unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15739 - 2005-03-31
of a crime considered at sentencing … unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15739 - 2005-03-31
State v. Earl W. Haase
at sentencing … unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so ....” A government agency may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30
at sentencing … unless the court finds substantial reason not to do so ....” A government agency may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24928 - 2006-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
(3)(c) was satisfied. In so finding, the court relied upon the child’s response to the spilled milk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76501 - 2012-01-18
(3)(c) was satisfied. In so finding, the court relied upon the child’s response to the spilled milk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76501 - 2012-01-18
COURT OF APPEALS
to the back of the vehicle, so the trooper grabbed Kestler’s arm in an escort hold[3] and forcibly walked him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32258 - 2008-03-26
to the back of the vehicle, so the trooper grabbed Kestler’s arm in an escort hold[3] and forcibly walked him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32258 - 2008-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the policy’s insuring agreement makes an initial grant of coverage. Id. If so, we next consider whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107438 - 2017-09-21
the policy’s insuring agreement makes an initial grant of coverage. Id. If so, we next consider whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107438 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the jurors did not do so in this case. For all these reasons, we conclude that Crenshaw has failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886263 - 2024-12-11
the jurors did not do so in this case. For all these reasons, we conclude that Crenshaw has failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886263 - 2024-12-11