Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50381 - 50390 of 82649 for case codes/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
and told him he was a suspect in a case the police were investigating. Without any more information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142665 - 2015-06-01

COURT OF APPEALS
applied the correct standard in its written findings. Indeed, the hearing in this case took place because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32164 - 2008-03-17

COURT OF APPEALS
when imposing its sentence. Here, the State recommended a six-year sentence in Xiong’s case due to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35637 - 2009-02-23

B&D Contractors, Inc. v. Arwin Window Systems, Inc.
2006 WI App 123 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2157 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25250 - 2006-06-27

05-01 Amendment to Supreme Court Rules relating to Cost Assessments in the Lawyer Regulation System (Effective 7-1-06)
, including the expenses of counsel for the office of lawyer regulation, upon the respondent. In cases
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24996 - 2006-05-01

COURT OF APPEALS
to this case. ¶8 Steinmann concerned the division of property where there was a valid marital property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47037 - 2010-02-16

2006 WI APP 180
2006 WI App 180 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP3338 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26092 - 2006-09-26

CA Blank Order
, 486 U.S. 429 (1988). The no-merit report addresses the joinder of the two cases, the entry of Pineda
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101935 - 2013-09-10

State v. Michael J. Stuempfig
. There were repeated delays and adjournments with respect to the trial in this case. On the trial date, June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20882 - 2006-01-09

State v. Earl A. Drew
of the case, wanted to avoid going to trial, failed to challenge the sufficiency of the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8976 - 2005-03-31