Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5041 - 5050 of 29928 for des.
Search results 5041 - 5050 of 29928 for des.
State v. Robert Stannard
commission of the felony. Id. On review of a probable cause determination, we review the evidence de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
commission of the felony. Id. On review of a probable cause determination, we review the evidence de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30077 - 2007-08-27
review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the circuit court must hold an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30077 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. App. 1993). Whether joinder was proper is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Maclin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316087 - 2020-12-22
. App. 1993). Whether joinder was proper is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Maclin
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=316087 - 2020-12-22
[PDF]
State v. Ian J. Tanner
, 26 (Ct. App. 1995). In deciding this question, de novo, we view the evidence in the light most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11492 - 2017-09-19
, 26 (Ct. App. 1995). In deciding this question, de novo, we view the evidence in the light most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11492 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
subsequently sought a de novo hearing before the circuit court. The circuit court held a hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154956 - 2017-09-21
subsequently sought a de novo hearing before the circuit court. The circuit court held a hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154956 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Traci J. Purdy v. Brian M. Purdy
reviewing its decision de novo, our standard of review requires that we affirm in part and reverse in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3813 - 2017-09-20
reviewing its decision de novo, our standard of review requires that we affirm in part and reverse in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3813 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court. Brownelli v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109103 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, and we apply the same methodology employed by the circuit court. Brownelli v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109103 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for Grant County: Robert P. Van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46658 - 2010-02-03
for Grant County: Robert P. Van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46658 - 2010-02-03
COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Second, we will use the facts to conduct a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54102 - 2010-09-07
findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. Second, we will use the facts to conduct a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54102 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Myers
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3310 - 2017-09-19
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3310 - 2017-09-19