Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5041 - 5050 of 18979 for inmates search.
Search results 5041 - 5050 of 18979 for inmates search.
[PDF]
State v. Towanka S. King
. The officers then searched King and found a Motorola telephone, $2,386, and a set of keys. ¶4 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19811 - 2017-09-21
. The officers then searched King and found a Motorola telephone, $2,386, and a set of keys. ¶4 After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19811 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
) (2013–14). 1 Mitchell contends that the blood draw was a search conducted in violation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
) (2013–14). 1 Mitchell contends that the blood draw was a search conducted in violation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
) (2013–14). 1 Mitchell contends that the blood draw was a search conducted in violation of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
) (2013–14). 1 Mitchell contends that the blood draw was a search conducted in violation of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215172 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Paul J. VanLaarhoven
that the police were required to obtain a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3537 - 2017-09-19
that the police were required to obtain a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3537 - 2017-09-19
State v. Paul J. VanLaarhoven
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject his argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3537 - 2005-03-31
a search warrant before submitting his blood sample for testing. We reject his argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3537 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
under the community caretaker exception to the search warrant requirement. We therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31
under the community caretaker exception to the search warrant requirement. We therefore reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
the community caretaker exception to the search warrant requirement. We therefore reverse the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12755 - 2017-09-21
the community caretaker exception to the search warrant requirement. We therefore reverse the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12755 - 2017-09-21
State v. Will E. Edwards
search informant Fleetwood to establish that he possessed no drugs; Fleetwood would then enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
search informant Fleetwood to establish that he possessed no drugs; Fleetwood would then enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13834 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence on grounds of an unlawful entry and search of her home. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197650 - 2017-10-11
to suppress evidence on grounds of an unlawful entry and search of her home. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197650 - 2017-10-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
related to the officer’s testimony about the basis for the search. Upon review, we agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644960 - 2023-04-18
related to the officer’s testimony about the basis for the search. Upon review, we agree with the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644960 - 2023-04-18