Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5041 - 5050 of 65123 for or b.

Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Roger C. Krejchik and Maxine Krejchik
and Maxine Krejchik d/b/a Rolling Meadows Farm, Defendants-Respondents, Firstar Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3406 - 2005-03-31

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Teresita J.
” is a question of law which we determine de novo. Cf. Joni B. v. State, 202 Wis.2d 1, 12, 549 N.W.2d 411, 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12196 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Duncan LaPlant
. ADM. CODE § ATCP 134.04(2)(b)(1)-(4), is unconstitutionally vague; and (3) WIS. ADM. CODE Chapter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8084 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. The proposed project was located in the “B-3 Downtown Business District,” adjacent to property owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67345 - 2011-07-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. §§ 943.32(2), 939.50(3)(c), 973.01(2)(b)3. The felony murder conviction carried a maximum prison sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910071 - 2025-02-04

[PDF] Ag Services of America, Inc. v. Roger C. Krejchik and Maxine Krejchik
. KREJCHIK AND MAXINE KREJCHIK D/B/A ROLLING MEADOWS FARM, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, FIRSTAR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3406 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). B. Exercise of Sentencing Discretion Insofar as Pender generally asserts that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185974 - 2017-09-21

State v. Virtis A.
or longer.” Mere incidental contact is not enough. Wis. Stat. § 48.415(1)(b) (“Incidental contact between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6667 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Caryl Sprague v. City of Madison
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: SARAH B. O'BRIEN, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8261 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
. § 804.11(1)(b), the requests should be deemed admitted. The court decided not to rule on the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31959 - 2014-09-15