Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5041 - 5050 of 58510 for speedy trial.

[PDF] NOTICE
, the trial court stated that it had received an additional one-count read-in list which alleged that Wade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34233 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 24, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion for postconviction relief because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64622 - 2011-05-23

Mark Garber v. Fidelis Omegbu
to be stated, we affirm the orders of the trial court in all respects. BACKGROUND ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25630 - 2006-06-26

[PDF] Amy Rumpff v. Timothy Earl Rumpff
argues that the trial court misinterpreted or misapplied child support regulations, erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6935 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. On appeal No. 2010AP1667-CR 2 Keith argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64622 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the grounds that the trial court erred when it permitted the jury to hear testimony that exactly one year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191819 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Mark Garber v. Fidelis Omegbu
2 motions. For reasons to be stated, we affirm the orders of the trial court in all respects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25630 - 2017-09-21

Amy Rumpff v. Timothy Earl Rumpff
with a judgment of divorce. He argues that the trial court misinterpreted or misapplied child support regulations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6935 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Karl Julius James
an order denying postconviction relief. James claims that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7794 - 2017-09-19

State v. Karl Julius James
) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) trial counsel had a conflict of interest; (3) the prosecutor made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7891 - 2005-03-31