Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50411 - 50420 of 74688 for public records.
Search results 50411 - 50420 of 74688 for public records.
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the Record, we conclude there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98640 - 2014-12-01
an independent review of the Record, we conclude there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98640 - 2014-12-01
State v. Shamseldin Ali Abdelwarress
upon the facts appearing in the record and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law.'” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9685 - 2005-03-31
upon the facts appearing in the record and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law.'” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9685 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
As the Board correctly points out, the appellate record does not include any document establishing that Slocum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88200 - 2012-10-15
As the Board correctly points out, the appellate record does not include any document establishing that Slocum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88200 - 2012-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of the appellate record. Absent exceptional circumstances not applicable here, we do not consider “assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25
of the appellate record. Absent exceptional circumstances not applicable here, we do not consider “assertions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120140 - 2014-08-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
issues. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925103 - 2025-03-11
issues. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925103 - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
Ronald A. Arthur v. William J. Keefe
not erroneously exercise its discretion. The record sustains the trial court’s findings of progressive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14365 - 2014-09-15
not erroneously exercise its discretion. The record sustains the trial court’s findings of progressive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14365 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from Juror 8 noted in the record; it merely indicates that counsel went on to ask Juror 15 about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251234 - 2019-12-17
from Juror 8 noted in the record; it merely indicates that counsel went on to ask Juror 15 about his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251234 - 2019-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasoning, the appellate court may search the record to determine whether the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708375 - 2023-10-04
reasoning, the appellate court may search the record to determine whether the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708375 - 2023-10-04
Cassandra Sherrill Patterson v. Lynns Waste Paper Co.
” as a “basis for finding prejudice in the record to account for a no-damage no-liability verdict,” and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10134 - 2005-03-31
” as a “basis for finding prejudice in the record to account for a no-damage no-liability verdict,” and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10134 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, especially the stores nearest the construction site, [and] sales records of similar furniture stores
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76601 - 2012-01-17
, especially the stores nearest the construction site, [and] sales records of similar furniture stores
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76601 - 2012-01-17