Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50441 - 50450 of 65039 for timed.
Search results 50441 - 50450 of 65039 for timed.
COURT OF APPEALS
of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85521 - 2012-07-30
of sentence, but not known to the trial judge at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85521 - 2012-07-30
State v. Robert J. Jeske
in sixth grade at the time, declared that he was going to take her to the high school prom. Later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8622 - 2005-03-31
in sixth grade at the time, declared that he was going to take her to the high school prom. Later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8622 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
touched her “between her legs.” L.M.R. was ten years old at the time of trial. According to L.M.R.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120646 - 2014-09-15
touched her “between her legs.” L.M.R. was ten years old at the time of trial. According to L.M.R.’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120646 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to forfeit the bond that could be forfeited based on those bail jumps. And at the time where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165625 - 2017-09-21
to forfeit the bond that could be forfeited based on those bail jumps. And at the time where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165625 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
account of the confrontation changed several times during the traffic stop. Johnston gave different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35516 - 2009-02-10
account of the confrontation changed several times during the traffic stop. Johnston gave different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35516 - 2009-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
on the record at the time of trial; (2) the security device interfered with his constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43443 - 2009-11-11
on the record at the time of trial; (2) the security device interfered with his constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43443 - 2009-11-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
with reasonable requests by the client for information); SCR 22.03(2) (failing to timely respond to an OLR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125366 - 2017-09-21
with reasonable requests by the client for information); SCR 22.03(2) (failing to timely respond to an OLR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125366 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gerard Noel Haas, Jr. v. William McReynolds
the second petition because (1) Haas was not restrained of his liberty at the time of the request, and (2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16424 - 2017-09-21
the second petition because (1) Haas was not restrained of his liberty at the time of the request, and (2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16424 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rule Order
and Rule Petition 15-01 (which I discuss in a separate dissent) are probably the first times
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158414 - 2017-09-21
and Rule Petition 15-01 (which I discuss in a separate dissent) are probably the first times
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158414 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jon M. Schirmang
the time Nos. 96-2008 and 96-2630-CR 2 period during which his prior OMVWI convictions could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11417 - 2017-09-19
the time Nos. 96-2008 and 96-2630-CR 2 period during which his prior OMVWI convictions could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11417 - 2017-09-19