Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50451 - 50460 of 54819 for n c c.
Search results 50451 - 50460 of 54819 for n c c.
[PDF]
State v. Willie J. Wroten
to the effective assistance of counsel. McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 n.14 (1970). To prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3390 - 2017-09-19
to the effective assistance of counsel. McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 n.14 (1970). To prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3390 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, when, why, and how.’” Data Key Partners, 356 Wis. 2d 665, ¶21 n.9 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037577 - 2025-11-18
, when, why, and how.’” Data Key Partners, 356 Wis. 2d 665, ¶21 n.9 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037577 - 2025-11-18
[PDF]
State v. Garrett A.B.
, among other things, to have “[n]o further law violations rising to probable cause.” Seven months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14068 - 2014-09-15
, among other things, to have “[n]o further law violations rising to probable cause.” Seven months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14068 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Mary A. Swieca n/k/a Mary A. Smith and State of Wisconsin, Petitioners-Respondents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96228 - 2013-05-01
Mary A. Swieca n/k/a Mary A. Smith and State of Wisconsin, Petitioners-Respondents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96228 - 2013-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Jerry B. Rooni
on State v. Swanson, 164 Wis. 2d 437, 453 n.6, 475 N.W.2d 148 (1991). There, the supreme court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
on State v. Swanson, 164 Wis. 2d 437, 453 n.6, 475 N.W.2d 148 (1991). There, the supreme court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5548 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 650, 660 n.4, 539 N.W.2d 98 (1995)). ¶9 “No deference is due an agency’s conclusion of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115918 - 2014-06-30
. 2d 650, 660 n.4, 539 N.W.2d 98 (1995)). ¶9 “No deference is due an agency’s conclusion of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115918 - 2014-06-30
Allan D. Schopper v. Sheriff Brad Gehring
. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. [1] "[I]n computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by chs. 801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11488 - 2005-03-31
. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed. [1] "[I]n computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by chs. 801
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11488 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Sweat
. Webster, 114 Wis.2d 418, 426 n.4, 338 N.W.2d 474, 478 (1983). Accordingly, we rely on Foley and Kelly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31
. Webster, 114 Wis.2d 418, 426 n.4, 338 N.W.2d 474, 478 (1983). Accordingly, we rely on Foley and Kelly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9391 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Prejudice must be “affirmatively prove[n].” State v. Wirts, 176 Wis. 2d 174, 187, 500 N.W.2d 317 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32889 - 2008-06-02
. Prejudice must be “affirmatively prove[n].” State v. Wirts, 176 Wis. 2d 174, 187, 500 N.W.2d 317 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32889 - 2008-06-02
[PDF]
State v. Frederick B. Harvey
that the circumstances “approach the absolute bare minimum .…” Id. at 513. It further warned that, “[i]n the future
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2297 - 2017-09-19
that the circumstances “approach the absolute bare minimum .…” Id. at 513. It further warned that, “[i]n the future
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2297 - 2017-09-19