Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50461 - 50470 of 57651 for id.
Search results 50461 - 50470 of 57651 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Samantha M. Penkoske
counterbalance common mitigating factors, such as one wrongdoer’s lack of a prior criminal record. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12230 - 2017-09-21
counterbalance common mitigating factors, such as one wrongdoer’s lack of a prior criminal record. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12230 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Colin N. Gelford
components if the defendant has failed to establish either one. Id. at 697. We choose to review only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14072 - 2014-09-15
components if the defendant has failed to establish either one. Id. at 697. We choose to review only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14072 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the decision it did based on the evidence. Id. No. 2012AP1729 3 ¶4 Fariole’s first three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102207 - 2017-09-21
the decision it did based on the evidence. Id. No. 2012AP1729 3 ¶4 Fariole’s first three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102207 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
support to the prima facie case of agency. See id. (and Fontaine v. Milwaukee Cnty. Expressway Comm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141777 - 2017-09-21
support to the prima facie case of agency. See id. (and Fontaine v. Milwaukee Cnty. Expressway Comm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141777 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that there is a “fair and just reason” for withdrawing the plea. Id. After listening to testimony from Hernandez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126104 - 2017-09-21
that there is a “fair and just reason” for withdrawing the plea. Id. After listening to testimony from Hernandez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126104 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
facts in dispute that entitle the non-moving party to a trial. Id., ¶24. DISCUSSION ¶6 No medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27607 - 2014-09-15
facts in dispute that entitle the non-moving party to a trial. Id., ¶24. DISCUSSION ¶6 No medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27607 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Elvin L.P., Jr.
, or that it is probable that justice has for any reason miscarried ….” Id. Elvin contends that “improper matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6597 - 2017-09-19
, or that it is probable that justice has for any reason miscarried ….” Id. Elvin contends that “improper matters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6597 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the credits should be applied to the sentence that is first imposed.” Id. No. 2014AP253-CR 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140354 - 2017-09-21
, the credits should be applied to the sentence that is first imposed.” Id. No. 2014AP253-CR 5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140354 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the entry of judgment.” Id. at 214. The key requirements for the writ are not present in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27369 - 2014-09-15
the entry of judgment.” Id. at 214. The key requirements for the writ are not present in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27369 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
substantial evidence that supports the agency’s determination. Id. The substantial evidence test does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257405 - 2020-04-14
substantial evidence that supports the agency’s determination. Id. The substantial evidence test does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257405 - 2020-04-14