Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5051 - 5060 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 5051 - 5060 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea colloquy was defective is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234877 - 2019-02-14
the plea colloquy was defective is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Brown, 2006 WI 100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234877 - 2019-02-14
State v. Robert J. Kossow
, the legality of a traffic stop is a question of law which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4403 - 2005-03-31
, the legality of a traffic stop is a question of law which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4403 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
there are sufficient facts to allow the issuing of an instruction is a question of law [that] we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102703 - 2014-10-06
there are sufficient facts to allow the issuing of an instruction is a question of law [that] we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102703 - 2014-10-06
CA Blank Order
the interpretation and application of statutes to the facts; our review is de novo. See State v. Keyes, 2008 WI 54
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95649 - 2013-10-15
the interpretation and application of statutes to the facts; our review is de novo. See State v. Keyes, 2008 WI 54
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95649 - 2013-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
’ arguments, the court suggested this was a “de facto summary judgment situation” and asked whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35191 - 2009-01-12
’ arguments, the court suggested this was a “de facto summary judgment situation” and asked whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35191 - 2009-01-12
James C. Dillard, Sr. v. Gary McCaughtry
the substantial evidence test de novo in this appeal, Dillard has not been prejudiced by the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13394 - 2005-03-31
the substantial evidence test de novo in this appeal, Dillard has not been prejudiced by the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13394 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Stannard
commission of the felony. Id. On review of a probable cause determination, we review the evidence de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
commission of the felony. Id. On review of a probable cause determination, we review the evidence de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
placement. Gutting’s analysis is incorrect. The court properly viewed this case as a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105006 - 2013-12-02
placement. Gutting’s analysis is incorrect. The court properly viewed this case as a de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105006 - 2013-12-02
State v. Phillip E. Holman
a defendant’s right to due process is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15458 - 2005-03-31
a defendant’s right to due process is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Pettit, 171 Wis. 2d 627
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15458 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert L. Prader v. Kenneth L. Keenlance
punitive damages are available is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Loehrke v. Wanta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16104 - 2017-09-21
punitive damages are available is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Loehrke v. Wanta
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16104 - 2017-09-21