Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5051 - 5060 of 57293 for id.
Search results 5051 - 5060 of 57293 for id.
State v. Rosemarie Parsons
of the case.” Id. at 694. The ultimate determination whether counsel’s performance was deficient and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3894 - 2005-03-31
of the case.” Id. at 694. The ultimate determination whether counsel’s performance was deficient and, if so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of those facts to constitutional principles. See id. No. 2018AP920-CR 4 ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238427 - 2019-04-02
the application of those facts to constitutional principles. See id. No. 2018AP920-CR 4 ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238427 - 2019-04-02
[PDF]
Frontsheet
decision[.]" Id., ¶4. This claim was rebutted in Jackson, 407 Wis. 2d 73, ¶¶4-5 (Rebecca Grassl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781214 - 2024-03-26
decision[.]" Id., ¶4. This claim was rebutted in Jackson, 407 Wis. 2d 73, ¶¶4-5 (Rebecca Grassl
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=781214 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for help, but Roundtree fired more shots, shooting Johnson a total of thirteen times. Id. ¶3 Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103116 - 2017-09-21
for help, but Roundtree fired more shots, shooting Johnson a total of thirteen times. Id. ¶3 Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103116 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and using a demonstrative rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72293 - 2014-09-15
, and using a demonstrative rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72293 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment.” Id. ¶5 The prejudice prong is satisfied where counsel’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214612 - 2018-06-27
Amendment.” Id. ¶5 The prejudice prong is satisfied where counsel’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214612 - 2018-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
shots, shooting Johnson a total of thirteen times. Id. ¶3 Johnson identified Roundtree as his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103116 - 2013-10-21
shots, shooting Johnson a total of thirteen times. Id. ¶3 Johnson identified Roundtree as his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103116 - 2013-10-21
[PDF]
State v. Frank J. Geniesse
by the trial court. Id. at 344, 401 N.W.2d at 832. The Fourth Amendment analysis is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9759 - 2017-09-19
by the trial court. Id. at 344, 401 N.W.2d at 832. The Fourth Amendment analysis is based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9759 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes a new factor warranting sentencing relief is a question of law. Id., ¶33. If the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145725 - 2017-09-21
constitutes a new factor warranting sentencing relief is a question of law. Id., ¶33. If the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145725 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was not tried and there was a miscarriage of justice. See id. We rejected his arguments and affirmed. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09
was not tried and there was a miscarriage of justice. See id. We rejected his arguments and affirmed. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80704 - 2012-04-09