Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50521 - 50530 of 83028 for simple case search.

Armando Trevino v. Ladd & Milaeger
, he was able to have the sentence reduced to seventeen years’ imprisonment.[1] ¶3 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3972 - 2005-03-31

State v. Xhevat Tahiri
for postconviction relief and a discussion of the case and/or statutory law in support of defendant’s position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11704 - 2005-03-31

State v. Xhevat Tahiri
for postconviction relief and a discussion of the case and/or statutory law in support of defendant’s position
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11705 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Carole Hungerford v. State
of misdemeanor battery and disorderly conduct. Randall also faced two cocaine conspiracy charges in cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11999 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
for battery. Tuckwab defaulted, while the case proceeded to a jury trial against Parr and Anderson. The jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143490 - 2015-06-29

COURT OF APPEALS
.” At the motion hearing, the court determined it had jurisdiction over the case, the complaint was specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64627 - 2011-05-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was currently serving on a homicide case; and eight years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Robert B. Ciarpaglini v. Kelly Flury
the action was frivolous. Ciarpaglini requested the substitution of Judge Deininger and the case was again
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10723 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Milwaukee County v. Robert E. Berry
, 451 N.W.2d 752, 757-58 (1990) (citations omitted). Case law has defined “held out for public use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14922 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
The parties agree that the sentencing transcript in Porter’s case does not show that the court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35457 - 2009-02-04