Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50531 - 50540 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50531 - 50540 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Richard F. Modica v. Doug Verhulst
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8188 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8188 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 27
2007 WI APP 27 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2839-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27988 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 27 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP2839-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27988 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 27
2007 WI App 27 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2839-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27988 - 2007-02-27
2007 WI App 27 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2839-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27988 - 2007-02-27
[PDF]
includes counsel’s testimony to explain his or her handling of the case.’” State v. Domke, 2011 WI 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919206 - 2025-02-27
includes counsel’s testimony to explain his or her handling of the case.’” State v. Domke, 2011 WI 95
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919206 - 2025-02-27
Frontsheet
2015 WI 66 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP1345-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144056 - 2015-07-06
2015 WI 66 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP1345-CR Complete Title: State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144056 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2015 WI 66 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP1345-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144056 - 2017-09-21
2015 WI 66 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP1345-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144056 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
When the case did not resolve at the final pretrial conference on October 26, 2012, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219179 - 2018-09-18
When the case did not resolve at the final pretrial conference on October 26, 2012, the State filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219179 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Thus, according to the County, a reversal of the commitment order in this case would therefore have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362503 - 2021-04-30
. Thus, according to the County, a reversal of the commitment order in this case would therefore have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362503 - 2021-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), in what is Shelton’s fourth appeal to this court in this case.1 We conclude that all of his current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761189 - 2024-02-08
), in what is Shelton’s fourth appeal to this court in this case.1 We conclude that all of his current
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=761189 - 2024-02-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 3 Bradbury also asks that we reverse the subsequent judgment dismissing Bourne’s case against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227661 - 2018-12-17
. 3 Bradbury also asks that we reverse the subsequent judgment dismissing Bourne’s case against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227661 - 2018-12-17

