Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50531 - 50540 of 68517 for did.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on the record, and he alleged that the “judge was prejudice[d]” and “bias[ed].” Although we did not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925314 - 2025-03-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
then forced her to perform oral sex again; he did not ejaculate, but instead urinated into her mouth. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955435 - 2025-05-13

[PDF] State v. Constantine F. Weimer
, and that Weimer never talked with Ordonez about sex or money. The trial court did not believe Weimer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19094 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Dawn C.
of the petition. We conclude that the circuit court did err in failing to hear witness testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7657 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Appeal No. 2006AP1379-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2006CF19
were committed did not contain subsection (2)(c). 5 As mentioned above, the statute of limitations
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30956 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that, contrary to Griggs’s contention, his antisocial behavior did not begin with his mother’s death in 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91910 - 2013-01-22

State v. Odell M. Hardison
contends that this evidence was insufficient because the police did not take fingerprints from the gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20812 - 2005-12-27

[PDF] State v. Terrance J. Trammell
, the trial court did not reach the issue of consent because it concluded that Trammell lacked standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16023 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. James E. Powell
and acknowledged that “he also has contact in Illinois.” However, the prosecutor did not acknowledge that he
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9475 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Dawn C.
of the petition. We conclude that the circuit court did err in failing to hear witness testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7655 - 2017-09-19