Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50581 - 50590 of 57651 for id.
Search results 50581 - 50590 of 57651 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
and the need for rehabilitation. Id. ¶9 Here, the circuit court individualized Schmeltzer’s sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57149 - 2010-11-29
and the need for rehabilitation. Id. ¶9 Here, the circuit court individualized Schmeltzer’s sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57149 - 2010-11-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo whether those facts fulfill the statutory standard. See id. In reviewing whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168419 - 2017-09-21
de novo whether those facts fulfill the statutory standard. See id. In reviewing whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168419 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark Cianciolo
sentence.” Id. at 99, 441 N.W.2d at 280. The determination of whether the new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8114 - 2005-03-31
sentence.” Id. at 99, 441 N.W.2d at 280. The determination of whether the new factor justifies sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8114 - 2005-03-31
State v. Fernando R. Salinas
“important and relevant portions of the PSI” a sentencing court “must resolve such disputes.” Id. at 410-12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20482 - 2005-12-05
“important and relevant portions of the PSI” a sentencing court “must resolve such disputes.” Id. at 410-12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20482 - 2005-12-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, not this court. Id. at 504. Kennedy argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he fired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731624 - 2023-11-22
, not this court. Id. at 504. Kennedy argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he fired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731624 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to testify; and (2) the defendant has discussed this right with his or her counsel. Id., ¶43
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194715 - 2017-09-21
right to testify; and (2) the defendant has discussed this right with his or her counsel. Id., ¶43
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194715 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact.” Id. In Riley’s testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103379 - 2013-10-21
for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact.” Id. In Riley’s testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103379 - 2013-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The weight to be given to each factor is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. See id. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181812 - 2017-09-21
. The weight to be given to each factor is committed to the circuit court’s discretion. See id. Our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181812 - 2017-09-21
Spencer McClain v. Marianne A. Cooke
rules because “‘an agency is bound by the procedural regulations which it itself has promulgated.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11300 - 2005-03-31
rules because “‘an agency is bound by the procedural regulations which it itself has promulgated.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11300 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick B.
to ascertain its meaning. See id. We conclude that § 48.415(1)(b), STATS., is unambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12291 - 2017-09-21
to ascertain its meaning. See id. We conclude that § 48.415(1)(b), STATS., is unambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12291 - 2017-09-21