Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50591 - 50600 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50591 - 50600 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. James W.
so, and, often, not even then. The social worker to whom James W.’s case was assigned in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25338 - 2017-09-21
so, and, often, not even then. The social worker to whom James W.’s case was assigned in October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25338 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael J. Stuempfig
. There were repeated delays and adjournments with respect to the trial in this case. On the trial date, June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20882 - 2006-01-09
. There were repeated delays and adjournments with respect to the trial in this case. On the trial date, June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20882 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
State v. Guy Douglas
claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case because: (1) an improper definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11981 - 2017-09-21
claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case because: (1) an improper definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11981 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Discussion ¶8 As relevant to this case, the issues to be considered at a refusal hearing are (1) “[w
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
. Discussion ¶8 As relevant to this case, the issues to be considered at a refusal hearing are (1) “[w
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118797 - 2014-08-05
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137716 - 2015-03-15
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137716 - 2015-03-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is about a “reopen-and-amend” provision of a plea agreement, a phrase coined by prior Wisconsin case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54587 - 2010-09-21
is about a “reopen-and-amend” provision of a plea agreement, a phrase coined by prior Wisconsin case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54587 - 2010-09-21
Marla Biliack v. Mark Biliack
between the parties in each individual case. Id. The support objective is fulfilled when the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3334 - 2005-03-31
between the parties in each individual case. Id. The support objective is fulfilled when the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3334 - 2005-03-31
Dale G. Latus v. James Johnson
by Latus. Being unable to prove his damages, Latus asked the trial court to dismiss the case so that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12395 - 2005-03-31
by Latus. Being unable to prove his damages, Latus asked the trial court to dismiss the case so that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12395 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
applied the correct standard in its written findings. Indeed, the hearing in this case took place because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32164 - 2008-03-17
applied the correct standard in its written findings. Indeed, the hearing in this case took place because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32164 - 2008-03-17
[PDF]
State v. Lenny Keding
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3082 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11617 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3082 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11617 - 2017-09-19