Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50591 - 50600 of 68347 for did.
Search results 50591 - 50600 of 68347 for did.
Angela M.W. v. Timothy E.D.
placement and child support was held on December 15, 1997. The circuit court was not requested to and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13878 - 2005-03-31
placement and child support was held on December 15, 1997. The circuit court was not requested to and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13878 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frederick Rogers v. DOC
the circuit court did not err in dismissing this action on sovereign immunity grounds. Further, we find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21703 - 2017-09-21
the circuit court did not err in dismissing this action on sovereign immunity grounds. Further, we find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21703 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
slowed down to let Bohn pass so that he could see the license plate. Bohn did not pass. Schulman slowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36807 - 2009-06-16
slowed down to let Bohn pass so that he could see the license plate. Bohn did not pass. Schulman slowed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36807 - 2009-06-16
[PDF]
State v. Michael John Noonan
of this case, the court finds that the Florence County Sheriff[’s] Department did incur expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15034 - 2017-09-21
of this case, the court finds that the Florence County Sheriff[’s] Department did incur expenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15034 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul A. Gocker
? WITNESS: A field sobriety test. DEFENSE COUNSEL: Okay. Is it true that Mr. Gocker did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7397 - 2017-09-20
? WITNESS: A field sobriety test. DEFENSE COUNSEL: Okay. Is it true that Mr. Gocker did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7397 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Edward F.W.
. at ¶19. No. 00-1382 5 ¶9 However, that did not end the inquiry. We also recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2623 - 2017-09-19
. at ¶19. No. 00-1382 5 ¶9 However, that did not end the inquiry. We also recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2623 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lawrence Pieczynski v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of the written complaint, whichever is later. The department did not explain why it chose not to adjust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14753 - 2017-09-21
of the written complaint, whichever is later. The department did not explain why it chose not to adjust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14753 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and demanded to know “[w]here the money at?” When D.M. responded that he did not have money, Willis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410240 - 2021-08-17
, and demanded to know “[w]here the money at?” When D.M. responded that he did not have money, Willis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=410240 - 2021-08-17
Joseph W. Volkmann v. Superior Home Services, Inc.
Superior concedes that “Volkmann did substantially perform all three contracts.” Superior contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4689 - 2005-03-31
Superior concedes that “Volkmann did substantially perform all three contracts.” Superior contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4689 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Rhonda S.W.
at the present time in your opinion would be the least restrictive form of treatment? A Yes. Q Did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15389 - 2017-09-21
at the present time in your opinion would be the least restrictive form of treatment? A Yes. Q Did you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15389 - 2017-09-21