Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50591 - 50600 of 68388 for law.

[PDF] Eric E. Rice v. Gerald Sielaff, M.D.
a mistaken view of the evidence or an erroneous view of the law. Id. at 580-81 (citations omitted). ¶25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24661 - 2017-09-21

2006 WI APP 212
of law we decide de novo. State v. Felton, 110 Wis. 2d 485, 504-05, 329 N.W.2d 161 (1983) (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26600 - 2006-10-30

[PDF] State v. Pamela L. Peters
prior occasions has identified herself to law enforcement authorities or in connection with court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16573 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the rape shield law, WIS. STAT. § 972.11(2) (2015-16) 3 , which “generally prohibits the introduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228350 - 2018-11-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2015AP1357-CR 7 deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180727 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
there’s been some case law that some of this—the date of events post-filing, so what I’m going to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290186 - 2020-09-22

[PDF] Shabretta Evans v. Daniel C. Luebke
of law that we decide without deference to the circuit court. See State ex rel. V.J.H. v. C.A.B., 163
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5574 - 2017-09-19

WI App 113 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2634 Complete Title...
’ dispute, we must interpret and apply Wis. Stat. § 980.09 in light of existing case law. This presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66896 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] WI App 147
was submitted on the briefs of Robert R. Henak of Henak Law Office of Milwaukee. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72631 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jonathon D. Bell
of the law. See id. ¶14 Newly discovered evidence may be sufficient to show that a manifest injustice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13996 - 2014-09-15