Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5061 - 5070 of 69380 for as he.
Search results 5061 - 5070 of 69380 for as he.
State v. Edward W. Ruzga
“seemed like he was pacing, like he was kind of fidgety,” and he was looking out the window as if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26514 - 2006-09-19
“seemed like he was pacing, like he was kind of fidgety,” and he was looking out the window as if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26514 - 2006-09-19
[PDF]
Racine County Human Services Department v. Timothy H.
) was not voluntary pursuant to § 48.41, STATS. He also contends that the proceedings constituted “child bargaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14299 - 2014-09-15
) was not voluntary pursuant to § 48.41, STATS. He also contends that the proceedings constituted “child bargaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14299 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Eugene Thomas
). He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16169 - 2017-09-21
). He has also appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16169 - 2017-09-21
State v. Johnny D. Polk
: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel from Attorneys Thomas Bartell and Leroy Jones; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3533 - 2005-03-31
: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel from Attorneys Thomas Bartell and Leroy Jones; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3533 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from the judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict, for one count of theft from a person. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=692962 - 2023-08-22
from the judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict, for one count of theft from a person. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=692962 - 2023-08-22
[PDF]
Bruce G. Felland v. William R. Sauey
if it is enforceable. On cross-appeal, Felland asserts that Sauey waived an agency defense because he failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2879 - 2017-09-19
if it is enforceable. On cross-appeal, Felland asserts that Sauey waived an agency defense because he failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2879 - 2017-09-19
State v. Eugene P. Opalewski
1999, he had sexual contact with his five-year-old daughter while the two showered together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4170 - 2005-03-31
1999, he had sexual contact with his five-year-old daughter while the two showered together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4170 - 2005-03-31
State v. Barry A. Kundert
appeals a judgment convicting him of obstructing an officer, claiming he should be granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3442 - 2005-03-31
appeals a judgment convicting him of obstructing an officer, claiming he should be granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3442 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Stanley Washington v. David H. Schwarz
No. 00-0004 2 upon his uncorroborated extrajudicial admission that he had committed a sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2097 - 2017-09-19
No. 00-0004 2 upon his uncorroborated extrajudicial admission that he had committed a sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2097 - 2017-09-19
Bruce G. Felland v. William R. Sauey
because he failed to raise the issue in his answer or at trial. ¶2 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2879 - 2005-03-31
because he failed to raise the issue in his answer or at trial. ¶2 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2879 - 2005-03-31