Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5061 - 5070 of 7548 for ye.
Search results 5061 - 5070 of 7548 for ye.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the highway” incident was “primarily why [he] checked the C box,” Vicente replied, “Yes” but added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612211 - 2023-01-25
on the highway” incident was “primarily why [he] checked the C box,” Vicente replied, “Yes” but added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612211 - 2023-01-25
[PDF]
State v. Ronald J. Lubinski
if he had been involved in an accident that evening. Lubinski replied “yes,” and Staff informed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15008 - 2017-09-21
if he had been involved in an accident that evening. Lubinski replied “yes,” and Staff informed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15008 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
: And as a detective have you had any training on detecting honesty? A: Yes, ma’am. Q: And from your interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134396 - 2015-02-10
: And as a detective have you had any training on detecting honesty? A: Yes, ma’am. Q: And from your interview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134396 - 2015-02-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
said that he asked Wiseman “if he was having any problems at the facility, and he told me that, yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197715 - 2017-10-17
said that he asked Wiseman “if he was having any problems at the facility, and he told me that, yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197715 - 2017-10-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
to consuming any medication. Misko replied “yes,” at which time Barden’s defense attorney issued a standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31585 - 2014-09-15
to consuming any medication. Misko replied “yes,” at which time Barden’s defense attorney issued a standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31585 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
]: No. That would be fine. THE COURT: [Defense counsel], is that okay with you? [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66431 - 2014-09-15
]: No. That would be fine. THE COURT: [Defense counsel], is that okay with you? [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66431 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
believed those phone records would be helpful to the defense, trial counsel replied, “yes and no.” Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629636 - 2023-03-07
believed those phone records would be helpful to the defense, trial counsel replied, “yes and no.” Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629636 - 2023-03-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
factually inaccurate. THE COURT: Is that correct Mr. Morgan? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. Later during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56991 - 2014-09-15
factually inaccurate. THE COURT: Is that correct Mr. Morgan? THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. Later during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56991 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. …. If this wasn’t an insurance company, if the victim was claiming this, yes, the victim would have to have more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70321 - 2011-08-29
. …. If this wasn’t an insurance company, if the victim was claiming this, yes, the victim would have to have more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70321 - 2011-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Department?’ The answer would be ‘yes’.” From this comment, it is evident that in the environs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184639 - 2017-09-21
Department?’ The answer would be ‘yes’.” From this comment, it is evident that in the environs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184639 - 2017-09-21