Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50601 - 50610 of 68360 for did.
Search results 50601 - 50610 of 68360 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s rendition of the circumstances and Reed’s having “no objection” to proceeding as attired; Reed did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42146 - 2009-10-13
counsel’s rendition of the circumstances and Reed’s having “no objection” to proceeding as attired; Reed did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42146 - 2009-10-13
COURT OF APPEALS
and his periods in custody, demonstrating that the two did not coincide; (3) Burkett’s signature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44702 - 2009-12-21
and his periods in custody, demonstrating that the two did not coincide; (3) Burkett’s signature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44702 - 2009-12-21
State v. Steven A. Johnson
. He testified that they did not keep an inventory of tickets and could not determine how many tickets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9946 - 2005-03-31
. He testified that they did not keep an inventory of tickets and could not determine how many tickets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9946 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie Wardell Simmons
stayed the theft sentence and ordered seven years of probation. Simmons did not directly appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4038 - 2005-03-31
stayed the theft sentence and ordered seven years of probation. Simmons did not directly appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4038 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the court and was accurately described by the State. Thompson did in fact receive an aggregate sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476884 - 2022-01-25
to the court and was accurately described by the State. Thompson did in fact receive an aggregate sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476884 - 2022-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the documents did not establish that the victim was J.P. At a hearing on May 17, 2017, J.K. submitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197487 - 2017-10-11
, the documents did not establish that the victim was J.P. At a hearing on May 17, 2017, J.K. submitted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197487 - 2017-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS
agreement between a defendant and the State. Because the circuit court did not violate the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68656 - 2011-08-01
agreement between a defendant and the State. Because the circuit court did not violate the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68656 - 2011-08-01
COURT OF APPEALS
for this appeal and have granted his motion for such waiver. [4] In his response brief, Small indicates he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117799 - 2014-07-29
for this appeal and have granted his motion for such waiver. [4] In his response brief, Small indicates he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117799 - 2014-07-29
COURT OF APPEALS
the Property in order to access the Reeds’ land. In light of these record facts, we conclude, as did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88858 - 2012-10-31
the Property in order to access the Reeds’ land. In light of these record facts, we conclude, as did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88858 - 2012-10-31
State v. Priest Johnson
at the conclusion of sentencing, Johnson did not adequately explain why he did not raise these issues at the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26211 - 2006-08-14
at the conclusion of sentencing, Johnson did not adequately explain why he did not raise these issues at the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26211 - 2006-08-14