Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50601 - 50610 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 50601 - 50610 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claimed violations of constitutional rights other than a double jeopardy issue that could be resolved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680450 - 2023-07-18
claimed violations of constitutional rights other than a double jeopardy issue that could be resolved
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=680450 - 2023-07-18
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Miller
. In fact, he claims that in summarily dismissing his request for Huber law privileges, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2410 - 2017-09-19
. In fact, he claims that in summarily dismissing his request for Huber law privileges, the court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2410 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Timothy H. Powers
). There are four such factors to consider: (1) the proximity of the area claimed to be curtilage to the home; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13257 - 2017-09-21
). There are four such factors to consider: (1) the proximity of the area claimed to be curtilage to the home; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13257 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul C. Thaiss
pointing, in their opinion, to an involuntary consent. These are: (1) the officers’ false claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11174 - 2005-03-31
pointing, in their opinion, to an involuntary consent. These are: (1) the officers’ false claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11174 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
. Discussion ¶7 We review ineffective assistance claims as a mixed question of fact and law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28317 - 2007-03-05
. Discussion ¶7 We review ineffective assistance claims as a mixed question of fact and law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28317 - 2007-03-05
State v. Charles W. Johnson
not reasonably claim that he did not know he was deaf at the time of sentencing. Because Johnson knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14687 - 2005-03-31
not reasonably claim that he did not know he was deaf at the time of sentencing. Because Johnson knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14687 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is fatal to his claim no matter how liberally it is construed.” ¶10 Perez fails to demonstrate a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60547 - 2011-02-28
is fatal to his claim no matter how liberally it is construed.” ¶10 Perez fails to demonstrate a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60547 - 2011-02-28
COURT OF APPEALS
of a prescription drug conviction. When reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim, we may not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
of a prescription drug conviction. When reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim, we may not substitute our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
State v. Sean R. Haverty
for two years for refusing to submit to a chemical test. Haverty claims that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21286 - 2006-02-07
for two years for refusing to submit to a chemical test. Haverty claims that the arresting officer did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21286 - 2006-02-07
CA Blank Order
indicated to the court that he understood the information explained on that form, and is not now claiming
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131323 - 2014-12-03
indicated to the court that he understood the information explained on that form, and is not now claiming
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131323 - 2014-12-03

