Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50641 - 50650 of 82985 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50641 - 50650 of 82985 for case codes/1000.
State v. Marketta A. Hughes
2005 WI App 155 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2122-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18519 - 2005-07-26
2005 WI App 155 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP2122-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18519 - 2005-07-26
[PDF]
State v. John L. Dye, Jr.
to accept a Wallerman stipulation,” and overruling other cases that suggested such a stipulation, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5897 - 2017-09-19
to accept a Wallerman stipulation,” and overruling other cases that suggested such a stipulation, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5897 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670452 - 2023-06-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670452 - 2023-06-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to arrest. The question of probable cause must be assessed on a case-by-case basis, looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
to arrest. The question of probable cause must be assessed on a case-by-case basis, looking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Guy Douglas
claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case because: (1) an improper definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11981 - 2017-09-21
claims ch. 980 was unconstitutionally applied in this case because: (1) an improper definition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11981 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
. But, in this case, the court found that Mark had abused four children, denied the abuse, minimized it, and blamed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10164 - 2017-09-19
. But, in this case, the court found that Mark had abused four children, denied the abuse, minimized it, and blamed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10164 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. This led to a new case in which Wright was charged with possession of a firearm by a felon. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79392 - 2014-09-15
. This led to a new case in which Wright was charged with possession of a firearm by a felon. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79392 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances particular to this case.” ¶10 Contrary to Patrick’s perception, the circuit court provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183469 - 2017-09-21
the circumstances particular to this case.” ¶10 Contrary to Patrick’s perception, the circuit court provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2012AP1198-NM 5 the adjournment. The hearing was rescheduled and the State presented its case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102592 - 2017-09-21
No. 2012AP1198-NM 5 the adjournment. The hearing was rescheduled and the State presented its case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Marla Biliack v. Mark Biliack
individual case. Id. The support objective is fulfilled when the trial court considers the feasibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3334 - 2017-09-19
individual case. Id. The support objective is fulfilled when the trial court considers the feasibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3334 - 2017-09-19