Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50651 - 50660 of 64166 for records.
Search results 50651 - 50660 of 64166 for records.
State v. Richard M. Pease, Jr.
that the State did not knowingly use perjured testimony to obtain Pease’s conviction. The record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16288 - 2005-03-31
that the State did not knowingly use perjured testimony to obtain Pease’s conviction. The record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16288 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph L. Compton
is stripped from the record, there remains insufficient evidence to convict him of the crimes. Thus, he seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7087 - 2005-03-31
is stripped from the record, there remains insufficient evidence to convict him of the crimes. Thus, he seeks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7087 - 2005-03-31
Wayne A. Greenlee v. Rainbow Auction/Realty Co., Inc.
, that fact standing alone provides no basis for either equitable defense. There is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12513 - 2005-03-31
, that fact standing alone provides no basis for either equitable defense. There is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12513 - 2005-03-31
State v. Colin C. Morse
, the trial court must rely on “the facts appearing in the record.” Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis.2d 58, 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12405 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court must rely on “the facts appearing in the record.” Hartung v. Hartung, 102 Wis.2d 58, 66
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12405 - 2005-03-31
State v. Corey Miller
has the discretion to deny a hearing if the record conclusively demonstrates that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12493 - 2005-03-31
has the discretion to deny a hearing if the record conclusively demonstrates that a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
be an inadequate mechanism for reviewing his present due process claims because facts outside of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35063 - 2014-09-15
be an inadequate mechanism for reviewing his present due process claims because facts outside of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35063 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Gerald Breen v. David J. Winkel
emotional distress, referring to medical records and depositions in his appendix in support of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9740 - 2017-09-19
emotional distress, referring to medical records and depositions in his appendix in support of his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9740 - 2017-09-19
State v. Anthony T. Hicks
and, based on the record, we see none. His belief that the pubic hair specimens should be excluded because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8058 - 2005-03-31
and, based on the record, we see none. His belief that the pubic hair specimens should be excluded because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8058 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which permits the reviewing court to examine the record and determine if it contains facts which would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30053 - 2007-08-21
, which permits the reviewing court to examine the record and determine if it contains facts which would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30053 - 2007-08-21
American Total Security, Inc. v. Geneva Schultz
the quality of windows in the November 11, 2003, sales agreement against the record as it exists. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19744 - 2005-09-26
the quality of windows in the November 11, 2003, sales agreement against the record as it exists. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19744 - 2005-09-26