Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50671 - 50680 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50671 - 50680 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
James P. Watkins v. William G. Eastman
at the close of Watkins's case. It concluded that Eastman's shooting of the dog was permitted under § 174.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7979 - 2017-09-19
at the close of Watkins's case. It concluded that Eastman's shooting of the dog was permitted under § 174.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7979 - 2017-09-19
State v. Christopher James
told. That's the whole problem. As we move from different stages of the case, the parties produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8869 - 2013-04-18
told. That's the whole problem. As we move from different stages of the case, the parties produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8869 - 2013-04-18
COURT OF APPEALS
on the first-degree intentional homicide charge is binding on this court pursuant to the “law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76557 - 2012-01-17
on the first-degree intentional homicide charge is binding on this court pursuant to the “law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76557 - 2012-01-17
State v. Deann K. Baer
, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516.[3] Rutzinski has a strikingly similar factual pattern to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3617 - 2005-03-31
, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516.[3] Rutzinski has a strikingly similar factual pattern to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3617 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the deficiency was prejudicial to his case. Id., ¶14. If the defendant has failed to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117675 - 2014-07-22
and that the deficiency was prejudicial to his case. Id., ¶14. If the defendant has failed to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117675 - 2014-07-22
B&D Contractors, Inc. v. Arwin Window Systems, Inc.
2006 WI App 123 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2157 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25250 - 2006-06-27
2006 WI App 123 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2157 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25250 - 2006-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
applied the correct standard in its written findings. Indeed, the hearing in this case took place because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32164 - 2008-03-17
applied the correct standard in its written findings. Indeed, the hearing in this case took place because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32164 - 2008-03-17
State v. Michael J. Stuempfig
. There were repeated delays and adjournments with respect to the trial in this case. On the trial date, June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20882 - 2006-01-09
. There were repeated delays and adjournments with respect to the trial in this case. On the trial date, June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20882 - 2006-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. The cases on which Roberts relies to support his argument, however, both involve a strategic waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54341 - 2010-09-14
. The cases on which Roberts relies to support his argument, however, both involve a strategic waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54341 - 2010-09-14
[PDF]
Supporting memo for Supreme Court rule petition 19-01
, hearing, or trial of a specific case are not a “record” as defined in s. 19.32 (2), Stats
/supreme/docs/1901memo.pdf - 2019-01-25
, hearing, or trial of a specific case are not a “record” as defined in s. 19.32 (2), Stats
/supreme/docs/1901memo.pdf - 2019-01-25