Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50691 - 50700 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
Search results 50691 - 50700 of 82650 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the case and addresses the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts, whether the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737034 - 2023-12-05
of the case and addresses the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdicts, whether the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737034 - 2023-12-05
[PDF]
Gladys Jean Jones v. Eddie Jones
made a ‘reasoned application of … the appropriate legal standard[s] to the relevant facts in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13611 - 2017-09-21
made a ‘reasoned application of … the appropriate legal standard[s] to the relevant facts in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13611 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Grand Chute Auto Sales, Inc. v. David W. Lehman
was taken.” Sec. 779.415(1m). ¶9 We now apply the facts of this case to the statutory scheme of WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3786 - 2017-09-20
was taken.” Sec. 779.415(1m). ¶9 We now apply the facts of this case to the statutory scheme of WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3786 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude there is no basis for resentencing, but remand the cases with directions to the clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138599 - 2015-03-30
conclude there is no basis for resentencing, but remand the cases with directions to the clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138599 - 2015-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts of that case. Id. at 652. Because the quoted language is limited by context, Christman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208261 - 2018-02-13
the facts of that case. Id. at 652. Because the quoted language is limited by context, Christman’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208261 - 2018-02-13
State v. Karl Meyer
of the officer’s duties.” See Wis J I—Criminal 1766.[4] Because this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31
of the officer’s duties.” See Wis J I—Criminal 1766.[4] Because this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michelle A.H.
court addressed whether the evidence was relevant to a material issue in the case—namely, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5920 - 2017-09-19
court addressed whether the evidence was relevant to a material issue in the case—namely, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5920 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tawana D. Reed
and the particular case.” Id. at 265, 493 N.W.2d at 733. A sentencing court will exceed its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12096 - 2005-03-31
and the particular case.” Id. at 265, 493 N.W.2d at 733. A sentencing court will exceed its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12096 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard W. Foelker
that you are alleging," and denied the agency argument without further application of them to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10528 - 2005-03-31
that you are alleging," and denied the agency argument without further application of them to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10528 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the extension of her mental health commitment because Kathleen’s case manager failed to provide testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60234 - 2014-09-15
the extension of her mental health commitment because Kathleen’s case manager failed to provide testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60234 - 2014-09-15