Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5071 - 5080 of 40307 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.
Search results 5071 - 5080 of 40307 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Knapp
. Knapp argues that several new factors justify sentence modification. The alleged new factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9261 - 2017-09-19
. Knapp argues that several new factors justify sentence modification. The alleged new factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9261 - 2017-09-19
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
Yanick moved to reduce his sentences, arguing that the new penalties constituted a new factor. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
Yanick moved to reduce his sentences, arguing that the new penalties constituted a new factor. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6415 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence because it is unduly harsh and a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
and an order denying his postconviction motion to modify his sentence because it is unduly harsh and a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155108 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether there is a “new factor” that would allow Ellis to bring this motion despite the passage of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110000 - 2014-04-07
is whether there is a “new factor” that would allow Ellis to bring this motion despite the passage of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110000 - 2014-04-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent evaluation and filing a new petition. See WIS. STAT. §§ 980.031(3), 980.09(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108794 - 2017-09-21
an independent evaluation and filing a new petition. See WIS. STAT. §§ 980.031(3), 980.09(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108794 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chandra D. Dennis
Dennis presented a new factor for purposes of sentence modification. We reverse and remand for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9265 - 2017-09-19
Dennis presented a new factor for purposes of sentence modification. We reverse and remand for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9265 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Chandra D. Dennis
Dennis presented a new factor for purposes of sentence modification. We reverse and remand for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9264 - 2017-09-19
Dennis presented a new factor for purposes of sentence modification. We reverse and remand for further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9264 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for a new trial. The issue is whether the supreme court’s decision in State v. Dubose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33525 - 2008-07-28
postconviction motion for a new trial. The issue is whether the supreme court’s decision in State v. Dubose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33525 - 2008-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his sentence. The issue is whether there is a “new factor” that would allow Ellis to bring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110000 - 2017-09-21
his sentence. The issue is whether there is a “new factor” that would allow Ellis to bring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110000 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
construed the motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30. It concluded that Simmons had not shown a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85521 - 2014-09-15
construed the motion under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30. It concluded that Simmons had not shown a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85521 - 2014-09-15