Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50731 - 50740 of 61681 for judgment.
Search results 50731 - 50740 of 61681 for judgment.
COURT OF APPEALS
denying motions to reconsider and reopen a judgment dismissing his certiorari action against the Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74946 - 2011-12-12
denying motions to reconsider and reopen a judgment dismissing his certiorari action against the Town
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74946 - 2011-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326140 - 2021-01-21
that the judgments of conviction are summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326140 - 2021-01-21
Daniel Harr v. Judy Smith
for its performance with such certainty that nothing remains for judgment or discretion. C.L. v. Olson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3871 - 2005-03-31
for its performance with such certainty that nothing remains for judgment or discretion. C.L. v. Olson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3871 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas H. Richmond
affirmed the trial court's judgment, and rejected as being without merit the claim that Richmond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8816 - 2017-09-19
affirmed the trial court's judgment, and rejected as being without merit the claim that Richmond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8816 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Ellis, No. 2003AP3119-CRNM, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33622 - 2014-09-15
. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Ellis, No. 2003AP3119-CRNM, unpublished slip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33622 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment and order are summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491878 - 2022-03-10
issues for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment and order are summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491878 - 2022-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the judgment.” On June 12, 2025, Lauren filed a notice in which she “recognize[d] that the decision in H.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976939 - 2025-07-01
the judgment.” On June 12, 2025, Lauren filed a notice in which she “recognize[d] that the decision in H.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976939 - 2025-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of...
the victim in that case, and proposed introducing the criminal complaint and judgment of conviction. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28570 - 2007-03-26
the victim in that case, and proposed introducing the criminal complaint and judgment of conviction. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28570 - 2007-03-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
is of such a nature that knowledge of its existence at the time of trial would have prevented the entry of judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960649 - 2025-05-28
is of such a nature that knowledge of its existence at the time of trial would have prevented the entry of judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960649 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the judgment.” On June 12, 2025, Lauren filed a notice in which she “recognize[d] that the decision in H.C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976939 - 2025-07-01
the judgment.” On June 12, 2025, Lauren filed a notice in which she “recognize[d] that the decision in H.C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976939 - 2025-07-01