Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 50741 - 50750 of 60449 for two.
Search results 50741 - 50750 of 60449 for two.
COURT OF APPEALS
to two years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. After that sentence was imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34268 - 2008-10-14
to two years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. After that sentence was imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34268 - 2008-10-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ and ‘waiver’ interchangeably, the two words embody very different legal concepts. ‘Whereas forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328697 - 2021-02-02
’ and ‘waiver’ interchangeably, the two words embody very different legal concepts. ‘Whereas forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328697 - 2021-02-02
[PDF]
State v. Albert Gerald Kokke
it’s kind of a two-edged sword here. I’m trying to look at the potential benefits, probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3697 - 2017-09-19
it’s kind of a two-edged sword here. I’m trying to look at the potential benefits, probative value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3697 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
understand that? T.A.D.S. responded in the affirmative. ¶4 The circuit court also explained the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242095 - 2019-06-18
understand that? T.A.D.S. responded in the affirmative. ¶4 The circuit court also explained the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242095 - 2019-06-18
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. In connection with two nonevidentiary hearings the circuit court held on the motion, the court learned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989608 - 2025-07-30
. In connection with two nonevidentiary hearings the circuit court held on the motion, the court learned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989608 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
positions is that it is unclear what “selling” or “applied” mean under the plans.[3] Brown reads the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33514 - 2008-07-28
positions is that it is unclear what “selling” or “applied” mean under the plans.[3] Brown reads the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33514 - 2008-07-28
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Arpke
)(a) and (b), and 885.235(1g)(cd). Under these statutes, if a person has two or more prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2868 - 2017-09-19
)(a) and (b), and 885.235(1g)(cd). Under these statutes, if a person has two or more prior convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2868 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the influence, citing two Wisconsin Supreme Court cases to support this assertion: State v. Seibel, 163 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87285 - 2012-09-19
the influence, citing two Wisconsin Supreme Court cases to support this assertion: State v. Seibel, 163 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87285 - 2012-09-19
State v. Frederick N.
made no effort to find out about the trial date either[,] because he lost those two dates. So, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5128 - 2005-03-31
made no effort to find out about the trial date either[,] because he lost those two dates. So, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5128 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Rock Prairie Farms to the Trust. The motion further argued: “Even after two court judgments stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11
Rock Prairie Farms to the Trust. The motion further argued: “Even after two court judgments stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11